Why Nussbaum's post on the Dirk Smeesters case is so important
Job van Wolferen The news is replete with messages about data fraud. And so it goes for the blogosphere. David Nussbaum recently blogged about the Smeesters case. How accurate is Nussbaum in his...
View ArticleNot three, but five of Smeesters' papers contain suspicious data patterns!
Job van Wolferen In a previous post, In-Mind applauded Nussbaum’s post on Simonsohn’s paper and the Smeesters case. The conclusion: it is extremely unlikely that Smeesters merely used the Blue Dot...
View ArticleRetraction Watch: “Fraud committed by any social psychologist diminishes all...
Job van Wolferen Retraction Watch has news! Despite the absence of a public investigation into Lawrence Sanna's work, a sixth and seventh retraction of his work have appeared. They are accompanied by...
View ArticleFraud cases could not have been handled more differently, yet retractions...
Job van Wolferen Retraction Watch has been posting quite a few retractions by Sanna, Smeesters, and Stapel in the past few weeks. In this post, Job van Wolferen describes the major differences in how...
View ArticleThe Stapel Continuum
Dave Nussbaum The New York Times recently published a 6000 word article on Diederik Stapel. The article suggests that the difference between fraud and 'the grey area in science' (improper analysis and...
View Article
